|
Kuhblam
I've got two guns, one for each of ya'.
|
|
last online Sept 7, 2013 15:30:01 GMT -5
Guardian
|
|
|
Aug 7, 2010 21:26:46 GMT -5
Post by Kuhblam on Aug 7, 2010 21:26:46 GMT -5
Official Name: Resilience-Class Dreadnought Faction/Affiliation: Galactic Republic Navy Classification: Dreadnought Custom/Stock: Stock Dimensions-Height: 802m Width: 1012m Length: 3300m Manufacturer: Kuat Drive Yards Energy Source:- Primary: 6x Omega Primary Fission Reactors
- Secondary: 6x Beta K-08 Ion Reactors
Hyper Drive Rating:- Primary: Class 3
- Secondary: Class 5
- Tertiary: Class 9
Crew Necessity: 14,562 Armament:- 4x KDY Heavy MACs (2x Fore Dorsal, 1x Fore Ventral, 1x Aft Ventral)
- 4x Heavy Quad Turbolaser Turrets (2x Fore Dorsal, 2x Fore Ventral)
- 4x Heavy Dual Turbolaser Turrets (Port)
- 4x Heavy Dual Turbolaser Turrets (Starboard)
- 4x Medium Quad Turbolaser Turrets (2x Port, 2x Starboard)
- 3x Medium Dual Turbolaser Turrets (Aft Ventral)
- 8x Light Dual Turbolaser Turrets (2x Port, 2x Aft Port, 2x Starboard, 2x Aft Starboard)
- 10x Heavy Flak Cannons (5x Port, 5x Starboard)
- 4x Point Missile Defense Systems (1x Port, 1x Aft Port, 1x Starboard, 1x Aft Starboard
- 20x Point Defense Light Dual Laser Cannon Turrets (5x Port, 5x Fore, 5x Starboard, 5x Aft)
- 6x Ion Cannons (3x Fore Dorsal, 3x Fore Ventral)
Passenger Capacity: 24,000 Cargo Capacity: 800,000 Tons Consumables: 10 Years Hanger Facilities/Starfighter Capacity: 900 Other: 4x Heavy Tractor Beam Projectors Statistics-Speed: 2 Maneuverability: 2 Effectiveness vs. Starfighters: 6 Effectiveness vs. Capital Ships: 8 Armor: 8 Shielding: 8 Sensors: 6 Reliability: 8 Description/role:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gamov
The Stig
75 posts
0 likes
|
|
last online Sept 8, 2014 17:20:02 GMT -5
Youngling
|
|
|
Aug 7, 2010 22:04:07 GMT -5
Post by Gamov on Aug 7, 2010 22:04:07 GMT -5
Forgive me if I am out of line, as I do not claim to be the foremost expert on Star Wars ships, but isn't that picture of the Nebula-class Star Destroyer produced by the New Republic in the Legacy Era? Looks very similar to it if it's not that ship.
I'd also like to point out the cargo capacity. I think it's really high for a ship of this size. A stock Imperial II-class Star Destroyer could only manage 36,000 metric tons of cargo. This ship is a bit more than double the size of an Imperial, but that doesn't mean it can suddenly transport nearly a million tons of cargo. To do that, I would imagine a ship's dimensions may need to approach those seen in the Executor or Sovereign-class ships.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anna
You can run, but you'll only die tired
327 posts
1 like
Amateurs practice until they get it right. Proffesionals practice until they can't get it wrong.
|
|
last online Apr 10, 2021 14:00:59 GMT -5
Knight
|
|
|
Aug 7, 2010 22:08:47 GMT -5
Post by Anna on Aug 7, 2010 22:08:47 GMT -5
Just going to say a ship that size will need a ton more crew members.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kuhblam
I've got two guns, one for each of ya'.
|
|
last online Sept 7, 2013 15:30:01 GMT -5
Guardian
|
|
|
Aug 8, 2010 7:15:25 GMT -5
Post by Kuhblam on Aug 8, 2010 7:15:25 GMT -5
It is the Nebula; good spotting. However, since it hasn't appeared in time-line yet I'll leave it up to Arh.
I'll tone down the cargo a bit.
With dimensions, I'm trying to match those of the Dreadnoughts we have on the site, which are somewhat shorter than this. The Executor and such have fire-linked some 2,000 turbolasers which isn't even the tip of the iceberg for their weaponry; I don't want a real dreadnought which will destroy everything on the site. Rather, I want something I can produce in quantity to a limited degree.
Nighthawk, this ship is about the same length and thinner than the Inexpungable, which has about 10,000 less crew members, lol. They're not the same ship class and this has alot more weapons, but I'll leave it until Arh says something.
EDIT: Changed the picture, found something more suitable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
A®heim
One does not just make a dreadnought.
3,801 posts
6 likes
|
|
last online Sept 16, 2018 19:37:00 GMT -5
Master
|
|
|
Aug 12, 2010 1:40:33 GMT -5
Post by A®heim on Aug 12, 2010 1:40:33 GMT -5
It is always very difficult to review these behemoths. It's all in the relativity: fightercraft are easy, their measurements differ in the 10s, but dreadnoughts and the like can have measurements differing in the thousands. One little mistake in the review, and someone could end up with a VERY overpowered ship.
Rant done. At least it's not a dynamic-class.
Just a few nitpicky things:
Cargo down more
Put a unit of measurement after the ship's height
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kuhblam
I've got two guns, one for each of ya'.
|
|
last online Sept 7, 2013 15:30:01 GMT -5
Guardian
|
|
|
Aug 12, 2010 14:29:01 GMT -5
Post by Kuhblam on Aug 12, 2010 14:29:01 GMT -5
Added height, dropped the cargo about 50k.
|
|
|
|
|
|
A®heim
One does not just make a dreadnought.
3,801 posts
6 likes
|
|
last online Sept 16, 2018 19:37:00 GMT -5
Master
|
|
|
Aug 15, 2010 0:43:40 GMT -5
Post by A®heim on Aug 15, 2010 0:43:40 GMT -5
Approved
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
last online Jun 4, 2023 4:58:38 GMT -5
Master
|
|
|
Oct 30, 2010 19:41:18 GMT -5
Post by Talau the Ever-Lurking on Oct 30, 2010 19:41:18 GMT -5
it is...stock?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kuhblam
I've got two guns, one for each of ya'.
|
|
last online Sept 7, 2013 15:30:01 GMT -5
Guardian
|
|
|
Nov 30, 2010 16:45:08 GMT -5
Post by Kuhblam on Nov 30, 2010 16:45:08 GMT -5
Yes, Tal. Added that in.
|
|
|
|
|
