Kom'rk-class Assault Cruiser

[A®heim]

Crew: add a couple zeros

Armament: Heavy for a dreadnought

Passengers: add a zero

Speed: Way too high

Weapon stats: adjust accordingly to ^

Electronics: stop changing my template

Reliability: much too high as well

[Dire Wolf]

Can the mando's even have dreadnauts? I thought they were a smaller, less rich faction...

Edit: Oops, its a heavy cruiser. Well, isn't a little big for one of those? Like... I wouldn't expect the mandos to have very many battleships/battlecruisers... and they aren't that big, really. But I dunno, I've been out of the game for a bit. Stuff probably changed.

[A®heim]

Nope, the largest vessel their shipyards can support is a cruiser, which this (hypothetically) is.

[Dire Wolf]

The munificent class was also built roughly 3-4,000 years in the future. I would think twice about using it as a reference.

[A®heim]

I'm not well. Try me.

Crew: more

Armament: Heavy for a dreadnought

Weapon stats: adjust accordingly to ^

Electronics: stop changing my template

Reliability: too high, especially with crew size

I could argue my points. But I'm not going to.

[Sporky]

What's this 'electronics' supposed to be? Sensors? I think Arh was serious about changing the template. Keeping it as 'sensors' would be better for the uninitiated who don't know the difference, yo.

[Sporky]

My bad, then. =3 Am sorry.

Consumables seems a LITTLE high for a ship of this size, personally. I've made bigger ships with less. Though as consumables also includes oxygen, I can sorta see it..Arh's call in the end.

[A®heim]

My bad, too. Must have been the rough one at the top. Consumables is fine. Crew needs to be a bit higher still and keep in mind that when you fill out "Other" include a justification for the high sensor/electronics/computer stuff stat.

[Latus]

IMO number of armaments still seems a touch high, as does the armor. Crew still seems low for what your ship is.

starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Victory_I-class_Star_Destroyer

This ship is similar scale and scope of a Victory 1-Class Star Destroyer; in more than 3000 years the Victory 1 still has 5,200 sentient operators including officer staff and enlisted. This is after 3000 years of mechanical improvements. You could knock this down by a thousand so two for the lack of hangar or landing contingents but everything needs someone or a hundred to run it efficiently in a ship this size. This ship is more than the sum of its parts and needs folk to operate everything. Crank up the crew or crank down the armaments.

[Ashi]

actually, keep in mind that Kuat is known for it's designs with a very high crew requirement. The ISD mk 1 and mk 2 required over three times the crew a ship of it's size should have needed. It's partially explained by the really high maintenance requirement, but it's still really, really high.

For the average cruiser, a crew of 2,000-3,000 should be more than enough, and the latter should be used mostly in conjunction with normal cruisers. This is a heavy cruiser, which means no fighters to maintain, no massive mismatched machinery, and thus will be on the lower end of that scale.

Corden, call it 1500 at the least. Even if you made the whole thing a gorram logic circuit, it would be unable to maintain itself very well. The maintenance crew alone on a ship half this size is 3-400. This is not the GCW, unfortunately, so the crew requirements are still really high. They haven't had a dreadnought-class heavy cruiser yet to learn from.

Also, the 1-10 scale is not specialized or localized for one single class, it encompasses all of 'em. a 9 in armor is the kind of thing you would expect on a really heavy battleship or on a dreadnought. a 7 is appropriate for this size category, and is possibly even a little high.

[A®heim]

Ashi is correct. The scale applies to ships across the classes. And your crew is still insufficient. The sooner you start making more significant changes, the sooner you're kosher vlassic.

[A®heim]

I just thought it was a parody of Taim & Bak, I'm such a geek...

Anyway, this is MUCH better, thank you for keeping things civil. It's easy for these things to break down and complicate themsel- I think you know what I mean.

Estampada en verde